Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40192021›Full record

SynthesisOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2025

Stroke Risk in Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Reconstructed Individual Patient Survival Data.

Eda Liew, Jing Xuan Tan, Chen Ee Low, Doreen Shu Lin Goh, Esther Yanxin Gao, Yao Hao Teo, Emilie C M de Groot, Jasper Senff, Ching-Hui Sia, Leonard Leong Litt Yeo and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eda LiewYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4224-2263
Jing Xuan TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1800-8237
Chen Ee LowYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8652-0984
Doreen Shu Lin GohYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8010-2167
Esther Yanxin GaoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2311-7845
Yao Hao TeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0439-4097
Emilie C M de GrootDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jasper SenffDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6540-480X
Ching-Hui SiaYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2764-2869
Leonard Leong Litt YeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-0402
Anna SeeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2126-4665
Benjamin Kye Jyn TanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9411-6164
Benjamin Yong-Qiang TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1824-9077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough previous studies suggest an increased stroke risk in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors, the risk with various treatment modalities, including radiotherapy, is less certain. This study investigates stroke incidence and risk in HNC patients, including how different treatments influence stroke risk. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was conducted. REVIEW

methodsWe included all primary studies assessing stroke as an outcome in HNC patients aged 18 and older, regardless of cancer subtype or treatment modality. Incidence rates were pooled by reconstructing individual patient time-to-event data from survival curves. Random-effects meta-analyses were employed to compare stroke risk between HNC patients, healthy controls, and treatment groups.

resultsIn total, 15 studies (N = 2,295,447 patients) were included in the analyses. Among surviving HNC patients, stroke occurred at a rate of 1% per year (10% at 10 years and 15% at 15 years cumulatively). Meta-analyses showed that HNC patients had a significantly higher stroke risk compared to healthy controls (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.27-1.65; I

conclusionPatients with HNC face an elevated stroke incidence and risk, especially those treated with radiotherapy. This underscores the need for surveillance and tailored preventive strategies to reduce stroke risk in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsStrokeHumansIncidenceRisk FactorsSurvival Ratehead and neck neoplasmsradiation therapysquamous cell carcinoma of head and neckstroke

Identifiers

PMID40192021
PMCPMC12207361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.