ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2026
Variation in parrot jaw musculature.
Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feeding biomechanics in vertebrates and beyond.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026Article
- Cranial anatomy, palaeoneurology, palaeobiology and stratigraphic age of the large-bodied ornithopod,PeerJ · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psittaciformes, the order encompassing parrots and their relatives, are highly diverse and generally known for having a strong beaks used for multiple behaviors. The muscles related to the masticatory apparatus should reflect this functional complexity; however, few studies have described the cranial myology across the order. Through original dissections, we describe and compare the masticatory musculoskeleton of 27 species-the most taxonomically diverse sample of psittaciformes to date. As in previous studies, we found osteological differences in the configuration of the suborbital arch, zygomatic process, and temporal fossa, and while most muscles are relatively similar across the order, there are notable exceptions found in the morphology of the m. pseudomasseter, m. adductor mandibulae externus, pars rostralis, and a venter externus portion of the m. pterygoideus ventralis, pars lateralis. Our findings reinforce the amazing anatomical diversity found within this group-data that can be incorporated into future studies of the biomechanics and diversification of this order. Further analysis should focus on (a) filling in more of the remarkable number of species across the order, especially uncommon and functionally interesting taxa unavailable in the present study, (b) examining dietary specialization to understand whether dietary adaptive signals are encoded within this anatomy, and (c) advancing to anatomical studies with other techniques such as DiceCT to visualize the relationship and biomechanics of these muscles in 3D space and be able to evaluate specimens relatively non-destructively, a priority for hard-to-dissect (e.g., small) taxa and (e.g., rare) specimens that collections wish to more fully preserve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.