Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191981›Full record

ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2025

Evaluation of Caries Detection on Bitewing Radiographs: A Comparative Analysis of the Improved Deep Learning Model and Dentist Performance.

Baturalp Ayhan, Enes Ayan, Gökhan Karadağ, Yusuf Bayraktar

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Baturalp AyhanDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7488-895X
Enes AyanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5463-8064
Gökhan KaradağDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6489-3643
Yusuf BayraktarDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6250-5651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe application of deep learning techniques for detecting caries in bitewing radiographs has gained significant attention in recent years. However, the comparative performance of various modern deep learning models and strategies to enhance their accuracy remains an area requiring further investigation.

methodsThis study explored the capabilities of 11 widely used YOLO (You Only Look Once) object detection models to automatically identify enamel and dentin caries from bitewing radiographs. To further optimize detection performance, the YOLOv9c model's backbone architecture was refined, reducing both model size and computational requirements. The enhanced model was assessed alongside six dentists, using the same test dataset for direct comparison.

resultsThe proposed YOLOv9c model achieved the highest performance among the evaluated models, with recall, precision, specificity, F1-score, and Youden index values of 0.727, 0.651, 0.726, 0.687, and 0.453, respectively. Notably, the YOLOv9c model surpassed the performance of the dentists, as indicated by its recall and F1-score values.

conclusionsThe proposed YOLOv9c model proved to be highly effective in detecting enamel and dentin caries, outperforming other models and even clinical evaluations by dentists in this study. Its high accuracy positions it as a valuable tool to augment dentists' diagnostic capabilities. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results emphasize the potential of the YOLOv9c model to assist dentists in clinical settings, offering accurate and efficient support for caries detection and contributing to improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDental CariesDentistsRadiography, BitewingHumansartificial intelligencecaries detectiondeep learningdental radiographsYOLO

Identifiers

PMID40191981
PMCPMC12159791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.