ArticleEuropean journal of clinical investigation2025
Expanding interpretability through complexity reduction in machine learning-based modelling of cardiovascular disease: A myocardial perfusion imaging PET/CT prognostic study.
Article in European journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing clinically cardiovascular machine learning model for risk prediction via sample augmentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Expanding interpretability through complexity reduction in machine learning-based modelling of cardiovascular disease: A myocardial perfusion imaging PET/CT prognostic study.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning-based analysis can be used in myocardial perfusion imaging data to improve risk stratification and the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events for patients with suspected or established coronary artery disease. We present a new machine learning approach for the identification of patients who develop major adverse cardiovascular events. The new method is robust against the deleterious effect of outliers in the training set stratification and training process.
methodsThe proposed sum-of-sigmoids model is obtained by averaging the contributions of various input variables in an ensemble of XGBoost models. To illustrate its performance, we have applied it to predict major adverse cardiovascular events from advanced imaging data extracted from rest and adenosine stress
resultsThe sum-of-sigmoids model achieved a prediction accuracy of .83 on the test set, matching the performance of significantly more complex and less interpretable models (whose accuracies were .83-.84).
conclusionThe sum-of-sigmoids model is interpretable and simple, while achieving similar prediction accuracy to significantly more complex machine learning models in the considered prediction task. It should be suitable for applications such as automated clinical risk stratification, where clear and explicit justification of the classification procedure is highly pertinent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.