ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
An imaging and genetic-based deep learning network for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hesperetin Rescues Amyloid Beta-Induced Defects in Neurite Outgrowth UnderInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Vision transformer autoencoders captures local and non-local features in brain imaging to reveal novel genetic associations.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence construction: a review of the bridge between CT imaging features of lung ground-glass nodules adenocarcinoma and carcinogenic driver genes.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Interpretable multimodal learning for integrating neuroimaging and genetic data in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial and ER stress crosstalk in TBI: mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional computer-aided diagnostic techniques for Alzheimer's disease (AD) predominantly rely on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in isolation. Genetic imaging methods, by establishing the link between genes and brain structures in disease progression, facilitate early prediction of AD development. While deep learning methods based on MRI have demonstrated promising results for early AD diagnosis, the limited dataset size has led most AD studies to lean on statistical approaches within the realm of imaging genetics. Existing deep-learning approaches typically utilize pre-defined regions of interest and risk variants from known susceptibility genes, employing relatively straightforward feature fusion methods that fail to fully capture the relationship between images and genes. To address these limitations, we proposed a multi-modal deep learning classification network based on MRI and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data for AD diagnosis and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) progression prediction. Our model leveraged a convolutional neural network (CNN) to extract whole-brain structural features, a Transformer network to capture genetic features, and employed a cross-transformer-based network for comprehensive feature fusion. Furthermore, we incorporated an attention-map-based interpretability method to analyze and elucidate the structural and risk variants associated with AD and their interrelationships. The proposed model was trained and evaluated using 1,541 subjects from the ADNI database. Experimental results underscored the superior performance of our model in effectively integrating and leveraging information from both modalities, thus enhancing the accuracy of AD diagnosis and prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.