Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191758›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Advanced superimposition method to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of ceramic crowns fabricated using heat pressing techniques.

Nasser M Alqahtani, Saurabh Chaturvedi, Mohamed Khaled Addas, Manar Fahad A AlQahtani, Arwa Ahmed M Alhudiry, Shahrah H Qahtani, Mohammad A Zarbah, Asim Elsir Elmahdi, Marco Cicciù, Giuseppe Minervini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nasser M Alqahtani *Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Aseer, Saudi Arabia.
Saurabh Chaturvedi *Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Aseer, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed Khaled AddasDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Aseer, Saudi Arabia.
Manar Fahad A AlQahtaniDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Aseer, Saudi Arabia.
Arwa Ahmed M AlhudiryDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Aseer, Saudi Arabia.
Shahrah H QahtaniDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Aseer, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad A ZarbahDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Aseer, Saudi Arabia.
Asim Elsir ElmahdiDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Aseer, Saudi Arabia.
Marco CicciùDepartment of Biomedical and Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Catania University, Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe MinerviniSaveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital technologies can enhance the success of permanent crowns. The present study aimed to evaluate marginal adaptation and internal fit of permanent crowns fabricated using stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing technologies following scans using two different intraoral scanners (IOS) (Medit i700, shape (TRIOS 3)). Methods: Three typodont #14 teeth were prepared for full veneer all ceramic crowns with three types of margins-chamfer (CFL), rounded shoulder (RSFL) and rounded shoulder with bevel (RSBFL). A total of 360 study models were made and divided into two groups based on the type of intraoral scanner used for digital impressions. Group A in which the intraoral scanner MEDIT i700 was used, and Group B in which intraoral scanner TRIOS 3 was used (n = 360/group). The subgroups were made as Medit i700-SLA, Medit i700-DLP, TRIOS 3-SLA and TRIOS 3-DLP (n = 180/subgroup). These were further divided into three sub-subgroups based on the finish lines: CFL, RSFL, and RSBFL (n = 30 each sub-subgroups). All ceramic crowns were made on models and scanned to assess discrepancies (marginal adaptation and internal fit) at nine zones (Z1-Z9). Three-way analysis of variance and pairwise comparison was done (Tukey HSD test) ( Results: The mean marginal gap and internal fit values were lowest for Group A-1 with RSBFL in each zone. The intergroup comparison showed values for marginal gap and the internal fit were minimum for Group A-1 for each finish line design, with the lowest for RSBFL at zone Z2 0.04 ±0.001. Conclusions: Regardless of the IOS and 3D printing techniques, the smallest gap was observed in RSBFL, followed by RSFL and CFL. The all-ceramic crowns fabricated using a Medit intraoral scanner with an SLA 3DPrinter with a rounded shoulder finish line had the best marginal and internal fit.

Indexed as

CeramicsCrownsDental Marginal AdaptationDental Prosthesis DesignComputer-Aided DesignHumansPrinting, Three-Dimensional3D PrintingAll-ceramic crownCAD-CAMDental softwareDigital dentistryIntra oral scanPermanent crown

Identifiers

PMID40191758
PMCPMC11972566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.