ArticlePeerJ2025
Advanced superimposition method to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of ceramic crowns fabricated using heat pressing techniques.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Marginal and Internal Fit, Surface Roughness and Fracture Resistance of Hybrid Dental Crown Materials Fabricated With Milling and 3D-Printing Systems: An In Vitro Study.Australian dental journal · 2026Article
- Evaluating micro-CT as a tool for advanced research in prosthetic dentistry: systematic review and meta-analysis.Odontology · 2026Article
- Surface Conditioning Methods and Their Effects on Micro-Tensile Bond Strength and Micro-Chemical Properties of Glass-Infiltrated Zirconia: An In Vitro Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital technologies can enhance the success of permanent crowns. The present study aimed to evaluate marginal adaptation and internal fit of permanent crowns fabricated using stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing technologies following scans using two different intraoral scanners (IOS) (Medit i700, shape (TRIOS 3)). Methods: Three typodont #14 teeth were prepared for full veneer all ceramic crowns with three types of margins-chamfer (CFL), rounded shoulder (RSFL) and rounded shoulder with bevel (RSBFL). A total of 360 study models were made and divided into two groups based on the type of intraoral scanner used for digital impressions. Group A in which the intraoral scanner MEDIT i700 was used, and Group B in which intraoral scanner TRIOS 3 was used (n = 360/group). The subgroups were made as Medit i700-SLA, Medit i700-DLP, TRIOS 3-SLA and TRIOS 3-DLP (n = 180/subgroup). These were further divided into three sub-subgroups based on the finish lines: CFL, RSFL, and RSBFL (n = 30 each sub-subgroups). All ceramic crowns were made on models and scanned to assess discrepancies (marginal adaptation and internal fit) at nine zones (Z1-Z9). Three-way analysis of variance and pairwise comparison was done (Tukey HSD test) ( Results: The mean marginal gap and internal fit values were lowest for Group A-1 with RSBFL in each zone. The intergroup comparison showed values for marginal gap and the internal fit were minimum for Group A-1 for each finish line design, with the lowest for RSBFL at zone Z2 0.04 ±0.001. Conclusions: Regardless of the IOS and 3D printing techniques, the smallest gap was observed in RSBFL, followed by RSFL and CFL. The all-ceramic crowns fabricated using a Medit intraoral scanner with an SLA 3DPrinter with a rounded shoulder finish line had the best marginal and internal fit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.