ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2025
A case report of Achilles tendon distractive rupture after shock wave therapy.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of this research essay is to critically examine the relationship between shock wave therapy usage and subsequent. Achilles tendon ruptures, with a specific focus on a case involving a 68-year-old patient with a history of Achilles tendinopathy, who experienced a perceptible pop and intense Achilles pain, after treatment with shock wave therapy. The assessment revealed typical rupture that was treated with surgical repair. By tracking the patient's medical history and various treatment methods employed, the study aims to clarify the complex link between therapeutic actions and potential risks. Additionally, the case report seeks to review current literature on the adverse effects of repeated micro-trauma from percussive ultrasound therapy, suggesting that an inadequate understanding of biomechanical principles may have contributed to the unexpected complications. Ultimately, the aim of the study is to raise awareness among clinicians about appropriate treatment protocols to ensure patient safety and optimal recovery outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.