ArticleJournal of transport & health2025
Driving status, avoidance, and visual impairment among older adults in the United States.
Article in Journal of transport & health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Clinically Relevant Threshold of Impaired Contrast Sensitivity Among Older US Adults.JAMA ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Visual Impairment and Driving in Older Adults: A Narrative Review.Current treatment options in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Late-life visual impairment (VI) increases driving difficulty and affects driving outcomes, such as driving cessation and avoidance. Existing studies are limited by small sample sizes and a lack of objective VI measures in older drivers on a national scale. Methods: Using nationally representative data from the 2022 National Health and Aging Trends Study, we examined associations between objectively measured VI, driving cessation, and avoidance among U.S. adults aged ≥65 (n=4,980). VI was defined using measures of binocular distance visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (CS). Driving cessation was defined as no longer driving in the prior month, and driving avoidance included avoiding driving at night, alone, and on highways. Results: Weighted sample characteristics showed that 9.4% of older adults had distance VI (DVI) and 9.2% had CS impairment (CSI). Nearly half of older adults with VI avoided driving at night, about 1 in 7 avoided driving alone, and more than 1 in 4 avoided driving on highways. Compared to those without any VI, older adults with any type of VI were more likely to report driving cessation (OR=2.31, 95%CI=1.62-3.29) and to avoid driving at night(OR=1.63, 95%CI=1.15-2.32), on highways(OR=1.41, 95%CI=1.02-2.05), and alone(OR=1.76, 95%CI=1.07-2.89). DVI and CSI were each significantly associated with all outcomes, with stronger associations for more severe DVI. For each outcome, the joint association of combined DVI and CSI was stronger than for a single VI. Discussion: Preventing VI and deploying interventions to restore vision are necessary to promote independence in late life by keeping older adults driving safely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.