ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Profiling X chromosome genes expression relevant to sex dimorphism in stroke: insights from transcriptomics landscape analysis.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although age is the most important non-modifiable risk factor for cerebral stroke, it is also apparent that females commonly exhibit longer lifespan and better outcome after stroke compared to the age-matched males. A critical event after stroke is the peripheral infiltration of immune cells across damaged blood-brain barrier, which induces inflammatory and immune responses within the brain parenchyma and consequently worsen brain injury. These events are also dependent on age and display a sex different pattern. Theoretically, X chromosome-encoded differential expression genes (DEGs) may explain differences between the sexes. However, the expression and regulation of these DEGs after stroke have not been studied in detail. Methods: We conducted three datasets of human blood cells, mice brain, mice microglia and T cells that were previously published, and analyzed the contribution of gender, age and stroke insult on the X chromosome-encoded DEGs. Results: The main findings were (i) compared to age, the stroke/hypoxia was a more potent factor in eliciting the DEGs. Particularly, older stroke patients exhibited more changes compared to young stroke group. (ii) After a stroke, the DEGs was diversely influenced by sex, age and cell types being studied. Particularly, either aging or gender led to more striking changes in brain-infiltrating T cells than in the resident immune cells. Discussion: These findings highlight the complex interplay between sex, age, and immune responses in mediating stroke incidence and outcome. Investigation of the identified X chromosome-encoded genes in brain-infiltrating T cells deserves high priority, as they may play more important roles in explaining gender-related differences in stroke and brain injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.