ArticleAPL bioengineering2025
Predicting the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation using heterogeneous drug-protein-disease network-based deep learning.
Article in APL bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Far Can Time-Series Models Go in Capturing Dynamic Stroke Risk Post Atrial Fibrillation?JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Machine learning and deep learning predictive models for prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ digital health & AI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current risk assessment models for predicting ischemic stroke (IS) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often fail to account for the effects of medications and the complex interactions between drugs, proteins, and diseases. We developed an interpretable deep learning model, the AF-Biological-IS-Path (ABioSPath), to predict one-year IS risk in AF patients by integrating drug-protein-disease pathways with real-world clinical data. Using a heterogeneous multilayer network, ABioSPath identifies mechanisms of drug actions and the propagation of comorbid diseases. By combining mechanistic pathways with patient-specific characteristics, the model provides individualized IS risk assessments and identifies potential molecular pathways involved. We utilized the electronic health record data from 7859 AF patients, collected between January 2008 and December 2009 across 43 hospitals in Hong Kong. ABioSPath outperformed baseline models in all evaluation metrics, achieving an AUROC of 0.7815 (95% CI: 0.7346-0.8283), a positive predictive value of 0.430, a negative predictive value of 0.870, a sensitivity of 0.500, a specificity of 0.885, an average precision of 0.409, and a Brier score of 0.195. Cohort-level analysis identified key proteins, such as CRP, REN, and PTGS2, within the most common pathways. Individual-level analysis further highlighted the importance of PIK3/Akt and cytokine and chemokine signaling pathways and identified IS risks associated with less-studied drugs like prochlorperazine maleate. ABioSPath offers a robust, data-driven approach for IS risk prediction, requiring only routinely collected clinical data without the need for costly biomarkers. Beyond IS, the model has potential applications in screening risks for other diseases, enhancing patient care, and providing insights for drug development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.