ArticleClinical interventions in aging2025
Antithrombotic Therapy Strategies and Clinical Outcomes in Chinese Patients Aged 65 and Older with High Ischemic Risk Coronary Artery Disease.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are at heightened risk for ischemic and bleeding complications. This study evaluates antithrombotic therapy use and its clinical outcomes in Chinese patients aged ≥65 years with CAD and elevated ischemic risk. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients aged ≥65 years with diagnosed CAD and ≥ 1 high ischemic risk factor from two centers. We recorded major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke-and bleeding events over a 2-year follow-up. Results: Of 1005 patients (mean age 76.3 ± 7.2 years; 25.3% female), 49.0% were aged 65-75 and 51.0% were >75. Antithrombotic regimens included no therapy (1.8%), single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT, 23.0%), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, 64.3%), and anticoagulation (10.9%), with 60.9% of the latter combining antiplatelet therapy. Older patients (>75 years) experienced higher MACE rates (11.5% vs 6.3%; RR: 1.825; 95% CI: 1.203-2.769; p = 0.004) and a trend towards increased bleeding (8.4% vs 6.5%; p = 0.257). Notably, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were significantly higher in this group. Anticoagulation therapy was linked to a higher, yet non-significant, MACE rate and significantly increased bleeding risk compared to SAPT and DAPT. Multivariate analysis identified age >75, LVEF <50%, and eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m Conclusion: In elderly CAD patients, those aged >75 years exhibit higher mortality and MACE rates, with anticoagulation therapy associated with increased bleeding. Age, reduced LVEF, and renal function emerge as critical predictors of adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.