Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191552›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2025

First Results for the Evaluation of the Cervical Cancer Screening Carried Out in 2021 and 2022 in the Context of the Organized Cancer Screening Program (oKFE): Part 1 - Primary Screening.

Juliane Hellfritsch, Marieluise Panzer, Sebastian Wagner, Kathleen Nieschke, Martin Grohmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juliane HellfritschGesundheitsforen Leipzig GmbH, Bereich Medizin und Versorgung; unabhängige oKFE-Auswertungsstelle, Leipzig, Germany.
Marieluise PanzerGesundheitsforen Leipzig GmbH, Bereich Medizin und Versorgung; unabhängige oKFE-Auswertungsstelle, Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian WagnerGesundheitsforen Leipzig GmbH, Bereich Medizin und Versorgung; unabhängige oKFE-Auswertungsstelle, Leipzig, Germany.
Kathleen NieschkeGesundheitsforen Leipzig GmbH, Bereich Medizin und Versorgung; unabhängige oKFE-Auswertungsstelle, Leipzig, Germany.
Martin GrohmannGesundheitsforen Leipzig GmbH, Bereich Medizin und Versorgung; unabhängige oKFE-Auswertungsstelle, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organized cancer screening programs (oKFE) aim to detect and treat various cancers in their early stages. The German oKFE Directive has set out the requirements for evaluating the efficacy, quality, and safety of such programs. The first evaluation report on the cervical cancer screening program in Germany was published in May 2024 and covers the years 2021 and 2022. Women with statutory health insurance who are above the age of 20 and live in Germany are entitled to be screened for cervical cancer. Between the ages of 20 and 34 years, women are offered an annual cytology-based examination. From the age of 35 years and above, screening consists of a cytology examination and an HPV test (co-testing). The current evaluable data consists of pseudonymized data obtained from statutory health insurance companies and service providers as defined by the specifications of the IQTIG. The evaluation shows that around three million women between 20 and 34 years of age undergo cervical cancer screening every year, which corresponds to a response rate of 45%. As regards the co-testing carried out in women aged 35 years and above, around 2.3 million women with statutory health insurance had cytological examinations and co-testing in 2021 and 1.3 million women were similarly examined in 2022. The participation rate for this cohort cannot yet be determined as the three-year interval for persons eligible for this type of screening cannot be depicted using only two years of data. 97% of cytology smears were unremarkable. Fewer than 0.1% of smears resulted in cytological findings indicating precancerous cervical lesions or cervical malignancies. The average positive rate for HPV tests carried out as part of co-testing was 8.56%. The high-risk human papilloma viruses 16/18 were identified in 30% of cases with positive HPV tests, and the presence of these high-risk viruses increased in parallel with an increase in the severity of cytological findings. More than 30% of insured women aged between 20 and 34 years have been fully vaccinated against HPV. The limitations of this evaluation are the short observation period, some data gaps, and the not yet implemented combination of screening data with data from the cancer registries of the German federal states. It is not yet possible to make valid statements about the acceptance of the screening program and the long-term impact of this program.

Indexed as

cervical cancerco-testingcytologyHPV testorganized cancer screening (oKFE)

Identifiers

PMID40191552
PMCPMC11968141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.