ArticleRoyal Society open science2024
Artificial intelligence for the identification of taphonomic bio-accumulator agents: an actualistic test of potential faunal accumulation agency applied to Tritons Cave (Lleida, Spain).
Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Connecting links with code: AI in morphological evolution.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Reassessing deep learning (and meta-learning) computer vision as an efficient method to determine taphonomic agency in bone surface modifications.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for the identification of taphonomic bio-accumulator agents: an actualistic test of potential faunal accumulation agency applied to Tritons Cave (Lleida, Spain).Royal Society open science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studying bone surface modifications (BSMs) in neotaphonomic research is an important aid to reconstruct agency in the archaeological and palaeontological record. The significance of correctly identifying BSMs has led to extensive debates about adequate methodological and interpretive frameworks to identify taphonomic agents and their bone-modifying patterns in dynamic taphonomic processes; especially those involving inter-agency interactions. Recent analytical innovations in the field have given rise to more updated and less biasing methods, including those rooted in multivariate statistics and artificial intelligence algorithms. Among the latter, convolutional neural networks have demonstrated a substantial potential in precision in the identification and characterization of BSMs. In this study, we present a successful application of these methods to reconstructing taphonomic agency in an archaeological context, specifically in Unit 2 of Tritons Cave (Lleida, Spain). Previous interpretations of this palaeontological layer suggested that it was a natural palimpsest created by carnivores, namely leopards. Through the present research, we objectively tested the original felid-accumulation hypothesis associated with the site's original taphonomic analysis. Our findings provide additional evidence of the primary leopard agency in the formation of the assemblage and underscores the significant potential of transfer learning for identifying taxon-specific carnivore agency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.