ArticleJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Ratio between Abdominal Defect Size and Abdominal Circumference Measured Preoperatively May Predict Type of Closure in Neonates with Gastroschisis.
Article in Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study was undertaken to explore if abdominal anthropometric measurements and pressure parameters measured before closure can predict the choice of surgical procedure in neonates with gastroschisis. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two neonates presenting to our tertiary center with gastroschisis over 18 months were included. Abdominal anthropometric measurements such as defect circumference (DC), abdominal circumference (AC), abdominal height (H), anteroposterior diameter (APD), and abdominal volume (AV) were measured soon after induction and again before final closure. Simultaneously, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and intravesical pressure (IVP) were measured. A protocol of pressure increase of >20% from the baseline for Silo was followed. The data were analyzed segregating the subjects into two those requiring Silo ( Observation and Results: Non-Silo group did not differ from the Silo group for DC, AC, DC: AC ratio, Height, APD, and AV. Significant differences were noted between non-Silo and Silo groups in PIP (16 ± 1.9 vs. 12.88 ± 2.66) and IVP (1.83 ± 2.64 vs. 1.20 ± 2.08) preoperatively and pre-closure. DC: AC cut-off for predicting Silo was ≥0.31, with 73% sensitivity, and 50% specificity. DC: AC correlated positively with preoperative abdominal height, pre-closure AV, and abdominal height ( Conclusions: Silo group had unfavorable abdominal anthropometric parameters as compared to non-Silo. DC: AC ratio which can be computed in a nursery setting and can be a promising variable to predict the type of closure for neonates with gastroschisis as it correlated with AV. A larger study is required to substantiate these conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.