ReviewJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Challenges in the Management of Pediatric Pancreatic Hydatid Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Our Clinical Experience.
Review in Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic hydatid disease (PHD) in children is rare compared to liver and lung involvement. The rarity and overlap with other cystic lesions often lead to challenges in the preoperative diagnosis and intraoperative surprises. Clear guidelines on the appropriate management of PHD are lacking. This review is intended to address these gaps in the literature. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), and ScienceDirect databases for pediatric PHD. Observational studies such as case reports, case series, and retrospective studies were included. Letters, editorials, conference abstracts, comments, animal studies, and non-English literature studies were excluded. After sorting out 794 articles, 11 articles describing 16 patients (including our cases) were included in qualitative synthesis. The author's two cases were described separately. Preoperative diagnosis was made in only 35.71% of the patients. Both the conservative surgical (92.86%) and radical approaches (7.14%) have been described with favorable results (85.71%). One patient managed with the conservative surgical approach developed a pancreatic leak. No recurrence was reported. PHD in children is rare. Accurate preoperative diagnosis is uncommon and requires a high index of suspicion. A normal pancreas, nondilated pancreatic duct, and normal enzymes in a patient from an endemic zone should prompt consideration of PHD. Surgical management must be individualized due to the limited data. Both conservative and radical approaches can be effective, but caution is needed for potential pancreatic leaks after the conservative approach due to ductal communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.