Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191435›Full record

ArticleBiometrika2025

Improving randomized controlled trial analysis via data-adaptive borrowing.

Chenyin Gao, Shu Yang, Mingyang Shan, Wenyu Ye, Ilya Lipkovich, Douglas Faries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrika, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. COADVISE: covariate adjustment with variable selection in randomized controlled trials.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2026
    Article
  2. An E-value-Informed Sensitivity Analysis Framework for Hybrid Controlled Trials.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chenyin GaoDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, 2311 Stinson Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3850-5587
Shu YangDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, 2311 Stinson Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-707X
Mingyang ShanEli Lilly & Company, Lilly Corporate Center, 893 Delaware Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA.
Wenyu YeEli Lilly & Company, Lilly Corporate Center, 893 Delaware Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA.
Ilya LipkovichEli Lilly & Company, Lilly Corporate Center, 893 Delaware Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA.
Douglas FariesEli Lilly & Company, Lilly Corporate Center, 893 Delaware Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA.

Funding

Transforming Clinical Trials for Elderly and Rare Cancers through Intelligent and Robust Information BorrowingR01AG066883 · NIA · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Xiaofei Wang, Shu Yang · 2020 to 2026
$2.0M
FDA HHS U01 FD007934NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, real-world external controls have grown in popularity as a tool to empower randomized placebo-controlled trials, particularly in rare diseases or cases where balanced randomization is unethical or impractical. However, as external controls are not always comparable to the trials, direct borrowing without scrutiny may heavily bias the treatment effect estimator. Our paper proposes a data-adaptive integrative framework capable of preventing unknown biases of the external controls. The adaptive nature is achieved by dynamically sorting out a comparable subset of external controls via bias penalization. Our proposed method can simultaneously achieve (a) the semiparametric efficiency bound when the external controls are comparable and (b) selective borrowing that mitigates the impact of the existence of incomparable external controls. Furthermore, we establish statistical guarantees, including consistency, asymptotic distribution and inference, providing Type-I error control and good power. Extensive simulations and two real-data applications show that the proposed method leads to improved performance over the trial-only estimator across various bias-generating scenarios.

Indexed as

Adaptive lassoCalibration weightingDynamic borrowingStudy heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID40191435
PMCPMC11972012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.