Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191415›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2025

Phylogenomics resolves key relationships in

Mark S Hibbins, Joanna L Rifkin, Baharul I Choudhury, Olena Voznesenska, Bianca Sacchi, Meng Yuan, Yunchen Gong, Spencer C H Barrett, Stephen I Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mark S HibbinsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.
Joanna L RifkinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.
Baharul I ChoudhuryDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.
Olena VoznesenskaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.
Bianca SacchiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.
Meng YuanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-3949
Yunchen GongDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.
Spencer C H BarrettDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.
Stephen I WrightDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9973-9697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex chromosomes have evolved independently many times across eukaryotes. Despite a considerable body of literature on sex chromosome evolution, the causes and consequences of variation in their formation, degeneration, and turnover remain poorly understood. Chromosomal rearrangements are thought to play an important role in these processes by promoting or extending the suppression of recombination on sex chromosomes. Sex chromosome variation may also contribute to barriers to gene flow, limiting introgression among species. Comparative approaches in groups with sexual system variation can be valuable for understanding these questions.

Indexed as

evolutionary genomicsphylogeneticsplantssex chromosome

Identifiers

PMID40191415
PMCPMC11968192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.