Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191410›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2025

The maintenance of genetic polymorphism underlying sexually antagonistic traits.

Ewan Flintham, Vincent Savolainen, Sarah P Otto, Max Reuter, Charles Mullon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A century of theories of balancing selection.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The battle of the sexes in humans is highly polygenic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Polygenic response of sex chromosomes to sexual antagonism.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ewan FlinthamDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Vincent SavolainenDepartment of Life Sciences, Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5350-9984
Sarah P OttoDepartment of Zoology, and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3042-0818
Max ReuterResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Charles MullonDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9875-4227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection often favors different trait values in males and females, leading to genetic conflicts between the sexes when traits have a shared genetic basis. Such sexual antagonism has been proposed to maintain genetic polymorphism. However, this notion is based on insights from population genetic models of single loci with fixed fitness effects. It is thus unclear how readily polymorphism emerges from sex-specific selection acting on continuous traits, where fitness effects arise from the genotype-phenotype map and the fitness landscape. Here, we model the evolution of a continuous trait that has a shared genetic basis but different optima in males and females, considering a wide variety of genetic architectures and fitness landscapes. For autosomal loci, the long-term maintenance of polymorphism requires strong conflict between males and females that generates uncharacteristic sex-specific fitness patterns. Instead, more plausible sex-specific fitness landscapes typically generate stabilizing selection leading to an evolutionarily stable state that consists of a single homozygous genotype. Except for sites tightly linked to the sex-determining region, our results indicate that genetic variation due to sexual antagonism should arise only rarely and often be transient, making these signatures challenging to detect in genomic data.

Indexed as

balancing selectiongenetic variationnegative frequency dependencepolymorphismsexual conflictsexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID40191410
PMCPMC11968185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.