ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Current trends in the allocation of National Institute of Health funding of brain tumor research.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The National Institute of Health (NIH) provides a sizable annual budget toward brain tumor research. However, funding allocation for specific pathologies remains poorly described. We aimed to characterize the current landscape of NIH funding toward brain tumors as a function of pathology. Methods: NIHRePORTER was queried to identify studies focused on glioblastoma, pediatric glioma, oligodendroglioma, brain metastasis, meningioma, pituitary adenoma, and vestibular schwannoma, from 2000 to 2023. Studies with R, U, and P funding mechanisms were included. Data were compiled and assessed according to pathology. Results: Across these 7 tumors, 3320 unique studies with R, U, or P funding mechanisms were identified from 2000 to 2023. These were conducted across 480 unique institutions. The sum of funds allocated to all studies was $1 607 662 631. Glioblastoma commanded the largest portion of funds, representing 54% of R mechanisms, 55% of R01-funded studies, 48% of U mechanisms, and 49% of P mechanisms, and accounted for 51% ($813 556 423) of total funding. Brain metastasis was the second most-funded tumor, representing 31% of all R mechanisms, 31% of all R01-funded studies, 26% of all U mechanisms, and 28% of all P mechanisms, and accounted for 29% ($472 715 745) of funding. The remaining 14% of R mechanisms, 26% of U mechanisms, and 23% of P mechanisms focused on the remaining pathologies, and accounted for 20% ($321 390 463) of funding. Conclusions: The current landscape of NIH funding for brain tumor research indicates that awarded mechanisms prioritize malignant intra-axial malignancies. Despite their prevalence, skull base neoplasia is far less represented in NIH-funded studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.