Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191402›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Current trends in the allocation of National Institute of Health funding of brain tumor research.

Noah L A Nawabi, Brian F Saway, Rohan Jha, Matheus Pereira, Neel H Mehta, Arabinda Das, Alicia Zukas, Scott Lindhorst, Ben A Strickland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noah L A NawabiCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2454-6636
Brian F SawayDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Rohan JhaHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Matheus PereiraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Neel H MehtaHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Arabinda DasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Alicia ZukasHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Scott LindhorstHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Ben A StricklandHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The National Institute of Health (NIH) provides a sizable annual budget toward brain tumor research. However, funding allocation for specific pathologies remains poorly described. We aimed to characterize the current landscape of NIH funding toward brain tumors as a function of pathology. Methods: NIHRePORTER was queried to identify studies focused on glioblastoma, pediatric glioma, oligodendroglioma, brain metastasis, meningioma, pituitary adenoma, and vestibular schwannoma, from 2000 to 2023. Studies with R, U, and P funding mechanisms were included. Data were compiled and assessed according to pathology. Results: Across these 7 tumors, 3320 unique studies with R, U, or P funding mechanisms were identified from 2000 to 2023. These were conducted across 480 unique institutions. The sum of funds allocated to all studies was $1 607 662 631. Glioblastoma commanded the largest portion of funds, representing 54% of R mechanisms, 55% of R01-funded studies, 48% of U mechanisms, and 49% of P mechanisms, and accounted for 51% ($813 556 423) of total funding. Brain metastasis was the second most-funded tumor, representing 31% of all R mechanisms, 31% of all R01-funded studies, 26% of all U mechanisms, and 28% of all P mechanisms, and accounted for 29% ($472 715 745) of funding. The remaining 14% of R mechanisms, 26% of U mechanisms, and 23% of P mechanisms focused on the remaining pathologies, and accounted for 20% ($321 390 463) of funding. Conclusions: The current landscape of NIH funding for brain tumor research indicates that awarded mechanisms prioritize malignant intra-axial malignancies. Despite their prevalence, skull base neoplasia is far less represented in NIH-funded studies.

Indexed as

brain tumor researchneuro-oncologyNIH funding

Identifiers

PMID40191402
PMCPMC11969036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.