ArticleImaging science in dentistry2025
Effect of a prototype 2-dimensional antiscatter grid on image quality obtained with a dental cone-beam computed tomography scanner.
Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: X-ray scattering adversely affects cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality, generating image artifacts, causing inaccurate tissue density representation, and reducing contrast. This study evaluated the performance of a 2-dimensional antiscatter grid (2D grid) prototype in a dental CBCT system. Materials and Methods: A focused 2D grid prototype was fabricated from tungsten and integrated with the detector of a dental CBCT system. Residual scatter transmitted through the 2D grid was corrected using a measurement-based scatter correction method. Phantom imaging experiments were performed in anatomical regions relevant to dental and head imaging with and without this grid. Following image reconstruction via filtered back projection, attenuation coefficients were converted to Hounsfield units (HU). Subsequently, scatter suppression performance, HU consistency, image artifacts, and contrast resolution were evaluated. Results: The 2D grid reduced scatter intensity by a factor of 10-20 in CBCT projections. Consequently, the grid substantially increased contrast, reduced image artifacts, and improved HU consistency. The contrast increased by 27% and 48% in bone- and soft tissue-equivalent regions, respectively. HU value deviations among teeth decreased from 510 to 146 HU. These results indicate improved visualization and tissue density representation fidelity in CBCT images acquired with the 2D grid. Conclusion: Use of a 2D grid could substantially improve the accuracy of tissue density representation and the contrast of dental and head anatomy in 3-dimensional images obtained with dental CBCT. Such improvements may translate to better quantitative evaluation of bone quality, enhanced tissue visualization, and more accurate model generation for surgical planning and guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.