Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191394›Full record

ArticleImaging science in dentistry2025

Impact of an intraoral X-ray cone with positioning laser lights on reducing radiographic errors with the bisecting angle technique: A technical report.

Suresh Kandagal Veerabhadrappa, Jayanth Kumar Vadivel, Seema Yadav Roodmal, Ummul Khairah Bt Ismail, Vipin Kailasmal Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suresh Kandagal VeerabhadrappaDepartment of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, Kota Damansara, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-594X
Jayanth Kumar VadivelDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1959-3419
Seema Yadav RoodmalDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, Kota Damansara, Pealing Jaya, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-6641
Ummul Khairah Bt IsmailDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0047-1106
Vipin Kailasmal JainAustralian Centre for Integration of Oral Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8168-4077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The bisecting angle technique (BAT) encounters difficulties in positioning the X-ray cone and aligning the central beam with the tooth. To address this, a rectangular laser featuring a pointed light was integrated into the intraoral X-ray cone. This study evaluated its effectiveness in improving radiograph quality and minimizing errors. Materials and Methods: Fifty fifth-year Bachelor of Dental Surgery students were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (n=16) used the paralleling technique, group 2 (n=17) employed the conventional BAT, and group 3 (n=17) utilized the laser-assisted BAT on mannequins. Two independent oral radiologists assessed the quality of the radiographs, categorizing the images as either diagnostically acceptable or not acceptable. Inter-group comparisons of quality and error rates were conducted using the chi-square test (significance level: Results: The paralleling technique group produced 77.5% diagnostically acceptable radiographs and 22.5% that were not diagnostically acceptable. These percentages were 65.3% and 34.7%, respectively, in the conventional BAT group and 75.3% and 24.7%, respectively, in the laser-assisted BAT group, showing results similar to the paralleling technique group. The quality of radiographs differed significantly among the groups ( Conclusion: The device produced higher acceptability and fewer radiographic errors than the conventional BAT technique, suggesting accurate adjustment of the X-ray cone and central beam to the desired teeth.

Indexed as

Dental RadiographyLasersTechnique, X-rays

Identifiers

PMID40191394
PMCPMC11966014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.