ArticleImaging science in dentistry2025
Mandible bone mineral density estimation using spectral panoramic X-ray imaging.
Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining mandible bone mineral density (BMD) scores using spectral panoramic imaging. Materials and Methods: Areal BMD scores were measured from the body and angle of the mandible in 3 anthropomorphic head phantoms using a spectral panoramic system (Planmeca Promax Mid, Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) equipped with a DC-Vela detector (Varex Imaging Corporation, Salt Lake City, USA). These results were compared to synthetic panoramic images generated from dual-energy CT acquisitions. Reproducibility was evaluated by repeatedly scanning 1 phantom with minor patient positioning errors, and the linearity of the BMD scores was assessed using calcium inserts in a Gammex 472 phantom (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, USA). Results: The experimental and synthetic panoramic images appeared visually similar. The mean synthetic score was 0.640 g/cm Conclusion: The BMD data obtained from spectral panoramic imaging are consistent with both dual-energy CT and Gammex phantom measurements. Consequently, spectral panoramic imaging shows potential as a method for osteoporosis screening, leveraging the widespread use of panoramic imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.