Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191392›Full record

ArticleImaging science in dentistry2025

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in the detection of maxillary sinus pathology using computed tomography: A concise systematic review.

Asmaa T Uthman, Habiba Abouelenen, Shaheer Khan, Omar Bseiso, Natheer Al-Rawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asmaa T UthmanDepartment of Diagnostic and Surgical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9362-4204
Habiba AbouelenenDepartment of Diagnostic and Surgical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7178-0558
Shaheer KhanDepartment of Diagnostic and Surgical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4358-102X
Omar BseisoDepartment of Diagnostic and Surgical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7689-8374
Natheer Al-RawiDepartment of Oral and Craniofacial Health Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7483-6594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study was performed to assess the performance and accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in the detection and diagnosis of maxillary sinus pathologies using computed tomography (CT)/cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 4 databases: Google Scholar, BioMed Central (BMC), ProQuest, and PubMed. Combinations of keywords such as "DCNN," "deep learning," "convolutional neural network," "machine learning," "predictive modeling," and "data mining" were used to identify relevant articles. The study included articles that were published within the last 5 years, written in English, available in full text, and focused on diagnostic accuracy. Results: Of an initial 530 records, 12 studies with a total of 3,349 patients (7,358 images) were included. All articles employed deep learning methods. The most commonly tested pathologies were maxillary rhinosinusitis and maxillary sinusitis, while the most frequently used AI models were convolutional neural network architectures, including ResNet and DenseNet, YOLO, and U-Net. DenseNet and ResNet architectures have demonstrated superior precision in detecting maxillary sinus pathologies due to their capacity to handle deeper networks without overfitting. The performance in detecting maxillary sinus pathology varied, with an accuracy ranging from 85% to 97%, a sensitivity of 87% to 100%, a specificity of 87.2% to 99.7%, and an area under the curve of 0.80 to 0.91. Conclusion: AI with various architectures has been used to detect maxillary sinus abnormalities on CT/CBCT images, achieving near-perfect results. However, further improvements are needed to increase accuracy and consistency.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputed Tomography, X-RayMaxillary SinusPathology

Identifiers

PMID40191392
PMCPMC11966023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.