Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191383›Full record

ArticleCurrent sexual health reports2022

Current Considerations in Interventions to Address Sexual Function and Improve Care for Women with Cancer.

Catherine Benedict, Kelly M Shaffer, Megan R Wirtz, Jennifer S Ford, Jennifer Barsky Reese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current sexual health reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multidisciplinary management of advanced ovarian cancer in Spain: expert recommendations for achieving maximum survival and improving patient care.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine BenedictStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Kelly M ShafferCenter for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Megan R WirtzHunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer S FordHunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer Barsky ReeseCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Sexual problems after cancer are common and multifaceted, particularly among women. The objective of this paper is to review recent and innovative behavioral (non-pharmacologic) interventions that aim to improve the sexual health of women affected by cancer. The review focuses on studies published within the past 5 years, focusing on interventions in three key areas for women with cancer: interventions to facilitate effective patient-provider communication about sexual health concerns, biopsychosocial interventions targeting women specifically, and interventions using a couple-based approach. Recent Findings: Overall, results suggest advancements in all key areas. First, efforts to facilitate effective clinical communication about sexual health concerns in cancer are growing. Findings from pilot studies were particularly encouraging for brief communication interventions in increasing clinicians' awareness and comfort in discussing sexual health with their patients. Second, studies have also begun demonstrating feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy for biopsychosocial interventions for women to improve sexual health, based on a variety of therapeutic approaches; technology-based approaches are gaining particular traction. Finally, consistent with prior reviews, recent research continues to support the use of couple-based interventions, suggesting that including partners in education and counseling about cancer-related sexual changes and solutions can have positive effects on patients, partners, and relationship functioning. Additionally, although efforts are growing to improve clinical communication and sexual health outcomes in special populations (e.g., adolescent and young adult survivors, sexual and gender minorities), greater efforts are needed. Summary: Findings from the review suggest benefit of recent interventions aimed to address sexual concerns and improve outcomes for women affected by cancer. Limitations of studies include small sample sizes and a lack of tailoring to address individual concerns and diverse populations. Future directions should consider existing barriers to participation while leveraging the opportunities for technology and evidence-based digital health strategies to optimize or individualize content and facilitate delivery.

Indexed as

CancerPatient–provider communicationPsycho-oncologySexual functionSexual healthWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID40191383
PMCPMC11970944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.