ArticleACS omega2025
Optimization of Shut-In Time for Hydraulic Fracturing-Assisted Oil Displacement in Offshore Low-Permeability Reservoirs.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To optimize the shut-in time for hydraulic fracturing assisted oil displacement in offshore low-permeability reservoirs, a coupled mathematical model encompassing injection, shut-in well, and production is established. The accuracy of the model is validated using production data. The law of pressure diffusion and oil-water two-phase flow during the shut-in well process is clarified, and the mechanism of hydraulic fracturing assisted oil displacement to enhance oil recovery is summarized. The sensitivity analysis is conducted, and then the main controlling factors affecting the optimal shut-in time for hydraulic fracturing assisted oil displacement are identified. The research results indicate that the primary function of the shut-in well is to enhance the effect of formation energy supplementation after injection, thereby further increasing the swept volume, controlling greater geological reserves, and ultimately enhancing oil recovery. During the initial stage of shut-in well, a larger portion of geological reserves are controlled mainly by fluid pressure diffusion, while in the later stage, oil-water exchange is mainly achieved by imbibition effect. The main controlling factors affecting the shut-in time are cumulative injection volume, formation pressure coefficient before hydraulic fracturing assisted oil displacement, and permeability, which should be given special attention on site. The research results provide a theoretical basis for the design of shut-in time for hydraulic fracturing assisted oil displacement operations in offshore low-permeability reservoirs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.