ArticleACS omega2025
Analysis of Surface Roughness and Strain Durability of Eyeglasses Frames by the 3D Printing Technology.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printer technology has developed rapidly in recent years and therefore has become the focus of attention in many areas. It has begun to be widely used in many areas in industry, medicine, biomedical, engineering, basic sciences, etc. Among these areas, the optician sector has also widely used 3D technology. Offering personalized eyeglass frame design, freedom of color, shape, and size in frames, 3D technology offers many advantages and conveniences for users and manufacturers. In this project, a 3D printer with high precision and consistency was developed, and eyeglass frames were designed and produced using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) filament types, different printing temperatures, and layer thicknesses. The surface roughness and the durability of the frames were analyzed by using an optical microscope and performing bending tests, respectively. It was observed that the lowest roughness occurred in the ABS-printed frame with 0.20 mm layer thickness at 240 °C temperature, and the highest durability of 54.7 mε obtained with the ABS-printed frames fabricated with 0.20 mm layer thickness at 235 °C temperature. Average roughness (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.