Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191306›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Laser Processing of YSZ Ceramics without Cracking: The Impact of Solvent Selection on Performance.

Muhammad Usman, Ken-Ichi Katsumata, Tetsuya Yamada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammad UsmanFuture Interdisciplinary Research of Science and Technology, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259-R2-23 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa 226-8503, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-2620
Ken-Ichi KatsumataDepartment of Material Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 6-3-1 Niijuku, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 125-8585, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3841-5354
Tetsuya YamadaFuture Interdisciplinary Research of Science and Technology, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259-R2-23 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa 226-8503, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1712-6027

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient thermal management during the laser processing of ceramics is critical to prevent surface damage and maintain structural integrity, especially for materials like Yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ), widely used in energy, aerospace, and medical applications. However, the laser processing of YSZ ceramics poses significant challenges related to thermal stress, leading to surface damage and compromised structural performance. This study examines the effects of various cooling media, including water, acetate, and citrate acids, on the surface quality, residual stress, and ablation depth of YSZ ceramics during UV laser processing. Results indicate that acids are the most effective cooling agents, achieving minimal cracking and superior surface quality compared with other conditions. Acid-based cooling reduced the residual stress by up to 84%, enabling shallow and consistent ablation depths. These findings underscore the importance of optimized thermal management to enhance the YSZ processing quality. Potential applications extend to dental ceramics, fuel cells, and aerospace thermal barrier coatings, where enhanced surface integrity is crucial. Future studies should further explore chemical interactions between acid cooling mediums and YSZ to refine laser processing techniques for high-performance applications across industries.

Identifiers

PMID40191306
PMCPMC11966576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.