Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191276›Full record

ArticleSocial movement studies2025

Persistent Chemicals, Persistent Activism: Scientific Opportunity Structures and Social Movement Organizing on Contamination by Per-and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Jennifer Liss Ohayon, Alissa Cordner, Andrea Amico, Phil Brown, Lauren Richter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social movement studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer Liss OhayonSilent Spring Institute.
Alissa CordnerWhitman College.
Andrea AmicoTesting for Pease.
Phil BrownNortheastern University.
Lauren RichterUniversity of Toronto, Mississauga.

Funding

Transdisciplinary Training at the Intersection of Environmental Health Science and Social Science (EH+SS)T32ES023769 · NIEHS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BRODY, JULIA GREEN, BROWN, PHILIP M. · 2015 to 2025
$3.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES023769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engagement with science is a prominent feature for many social movements, yet the dimensions of that scientific engagement and bidirectional relationships between science and advocacy are incompletely theorized in social movement scholarship. While social movement scholarship has previously demonstrated the importance of external political and economic factors for social movement processes and efficacy, we show that the emergence and success of environmental health activism is also dependent on dynamic relationships between scientific evidence and lay demands for particular types of knowledge production and application. Despite decades of industrial production and widespread contamination, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) were a politically obscure class of chemicals until a recent spike in attention from activist, regulatory, and scientific circles. Drawing from in-depth interviews with activists of PFAS-impacted communities, we develop the

Indexed as

activismenvironmental health movementsPFASscientific opportunitySocial movements

Identifiers

PMID40191276
PMCPMC11970358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.