Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191260›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as an adjuvant treatment for thoracolumbar acute hyperesthesia in chondrodystrophic dogs: a prospective blinded controlled clinical study.

Débora Gouveia, Ana Cardoso, Carla Carvalho, Marina Moisés, André Coelho, Maria Manuel Balça, Rui Alvites, Ana Colette Maurício, António Ferreira, Ângela Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Débora GouveiaArrábida Animal Rehabilitation Center, Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Setubal, Portugal.
Ana CardosoArrábida Animal Rehabilitation Center, Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Setubal, Portugal.
Carla CarvalhoArrábida Animal Rehabilitation Center, Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Setubal, Portugal.
Marina MoisésArrábida Animal Rehabilitation Center, Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Setubal, Portugal.
André CoelhoDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, Porto, Portugal.
Maria Manuel BalçaDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, Porto, Portugal.
Rui AlvitesDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Colette MaurícioDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, Porto, Portugal.
António FerreiraFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ângela MartinsArrábida Animal Rehabilitation Center, Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Setubal, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Acute paraspinal hyperesthesia in dogs can result in a combination of nociceptive and neuropathic pain, often requiring pharmacological intervention. However, non-pharmacologic approaches, such as two-channel transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), may also be beneficial. Evidence from human medicine suggests that conventional TENS reduces pain scores and potentially decreases the need for analgesic medication. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TENS as an adjunctive treatment for thoracolumbar paraspinal hyperesthesia in dogs. Methods: This prospective, blinded, controlled cohort study was conducted in a clinical setting. Dogs diagnosed with paraspinal hyperesthesia, classified as grade 4 or 5 on the modified Frankel scale (MFS) and with a dynamic interactive visual analog scale (DIVAS) score ≥14, were included. The subjects were randomized into two groups: the study group (SG), which received standard pharmacological protocol (PSP) plus TENS, and the control group (CG), which received PSP only. Observers blinded to treatment allocation scored video recordings of the dogs. Assessments were performed every 24 hours from T0 (admission) to T8, with evaluations in SG occurring 5 minutes before each TENS session. Results: A total of 818 dogs were enrolled, with 605 (74%) in the SG and 213 (26%) in the CG. In the first 48 hours, SG demonstrated a faster reduction in muscle tone compared to CG. While all dogs transitioned from a hyperesthetic to a non-painful state, SG showed a significantly faster recovery from T2 (48 h) to T4. A significant difference was observed between groups in DIVAS scores ( Discussion: These findings suggest that TENS may be an effective adjunctive therapy for managing acute thoracolumbar hyperesthesia in dogs, promoting early recovery by reducing pain, medication dependency, and hospitalization duration. However, the study's reliance on subjective assessments presents a limitation, potentially introducing bias. Further research with objective outcome measures is necessary to validate these findings and optimize the integration of TENS in veterinary pain management protocols.

Indexed as

DIVASIVDDneuropathic painparaspinal hyperesthesiaTENS

Identifiers

PMID40191260
PMCPMC11968726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.