ArticleCase reports in dentistry2025
Periapically Extruded Calcium Silicate Cements in Retreated Teeth: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcium silicate-based materials, known for their bioactive properties, are increasingly being used in endodontic therapy. Accidental extrusion of these materials into the periapical tissue is a relatively common phenomenon that can impede periapical healing. The aim of this article is to present three endodontically retreated case reports with moderate to extensive periapical lesions and to review the literature on this topic. The comprehensive search and analysis of the relevant literature included a review of 51 articles, of which nine case reports/series from 2010 to 2023 were considered. Based on the summarized data, over 80% of the retreated cases showed complete healing of the periapical lesions, while the success rate in initially treated teeth was over 90%. Healing of periapical lesions is the most common therapeutic outcome, even in cases where extrusion occurs. Despite this conclusion, extrusion of materials into periapical tissues should be avoided. Further case reports on the extrusion of calcium silicate-based materials other than MTA are recommended. When evaluating the success rate of periapical healing in such cases, it is recommended to extend the follow-up periods to several years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.