ArticleJournal of clinical and translational pathology2024
The World Health Organization System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: Standardized Categories and Practical Approaches to Pancreatic Lesions.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The World Health Organization System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology introduces a seven-tier category system to standardize terminology and nomenclature. This system includes the following categories: Insufficient/non-diagnostic, benign/negative for malignancy, atypia, pancreaticobiliary neoplasm low-risk/grade, pancreaticobiliary neoplasm high-risk/grade, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant categories. Adopting a standardized reporting scheme facilitates consistent diagnostic criteria among pathologists, thereby reducing report variability and enhancing communication with the clinical team for optimal patient management. The report also highlights the role of critical ancillary tests in improving diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic lesions and discusses practical approaches to managing solid and cystic pancreatic lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.