Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191033›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Outcomes of remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Achilles tendon allografts: A retrospective analysis of tibial tunnel widening and complications.

Siyeon Kim, Dae Keun Suh, Dong Won Suh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siyeon KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0541-1733
Dae Keun SuhDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Kyung Hee University Hospital Seoul Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0555-5326
Dong Won SuhJoint Center Barunsesang Hospital Seongnam-si Gyeonggi-do Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0321-1551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the outcomes of remnant-preserving Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using Achilles tendon allografts, focusing on tibial tunnel widening and complications. The primary research question is whether this technique results in significant tunnel widening and other complications. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 396 patients who underwent ACLR with Achilles tendon allografts between 2010 and 2023. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were taken post-operatively and at follow-up, with tunnel width measured at both time points. Tunnel width was measured perpendicular to the tunnel's long axis, assessing both anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions, 1 cm distal to the articular surface. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the tibial tunnel was calculated by multiplying the two measured widths. Statistical analysis included paired Results: Follow-up MRI scans of 179 patients showed a non-significant increase in the tibial tunnel CSA of 3.49 mm Conclusion: This study demonstrates that remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction using Achilles tendon allografts does not lead to significant tibial tunnel widening and has low complication rates, indicating that it is a safe and effective technique. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Indexed as

Achilles tendonallograftanterior cruciate ligamentreconstructiontibial tunnel wideningtranstibial

Identifiers

PMID40191033
PMCPMC11969242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.