Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191032›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

Integration of multimodal imaging data with machine learning for improved diagnosis and prognosis in neuroimaging.

Saurabh Bhattacharya, Sashikanta Prusty, Sanjay P Pande, Monali Gulhane, Santosh H Lavate, Nitin Rakesh, Saravanan Veerasamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Adaptive Integration of Incomplete Multimodal 3D Neuroimaging for Alzheimer's Prediction and Biomarker Discovery.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saurabh BhattacharyaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sashikanta PrustyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, ITER-FET, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Sanjay P PandeDepartment of Computer Technology, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Monali GulhaneSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Santosh H LavateDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, AISSMS College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Nitin RakeshSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Saravanan VeerasamyDepartment of Computer Science, College of Engineering and Technology, Dambi Dollo University, Dambi Dollo, Oromia, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Combining many types of imaging data-especially structural MRI (sMRI) and functional MRI (fMRI)-may greatly assist in the diagnosis and treatment of brain disorders like Alzheimer's. Current approaches are less helpful for forecasting, however, as they do not always blend spatial and temporal patterns from different sources properly. This work presents a novel mixed deep learning (DL) method combining data from many sources using CNN, GRU, and attention techniques. This work introduces a novel hybrid deep learning method combining CNN, GRU, and a Dynamic Cross-Modality Attention Module to help more efficiently blend spatial and temporal brain data. Through working around issues with current multimodal fusion techniques, our approach increases the accuracy and readability of diagnoses. Methods: Utilizing CNNs and models of temporal dynamics from fMRI connection measures utilizing GRUs, the proposed approach extracts spatial characteristics from sMRI. Strong multimodal integration is made possible by including an attention mechanism to give diagnostically important features top priority. Training and evaluation of the model took place using the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset including behavioral data, fMRI, and sMRI. Measures include accuracy, recall, precision and F1-score used to evaluate performance. Results: It was correct 96.79% of the time using the combined structure. Regarding the identification of brain disorders, the proposed model was more successful than existing ones. Discussion: These findings indicate that the hybrid strategy makes sense for using complimentary information from several kinds of photos. Attention to detail helped one choose which aspects to concentrate on, thereby enhancing the readability and diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: The proposed method offers a fresh benchmark for multimodal neuroimaging analysis and has great potential for use in real-world brain assessment and prediction. Researchers will investigate future applications of this technique to new picture kinds and clinical data.

Indexed as

data fusiondeep learning frameworkdiagnosis and prognosisfunctional MRI (fMRI)multimodal imagingneurological disordersstructural MRI (sMRI)

Identifiers

PMID40191032
PMCPMC11968424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.