ArticleInterface focus2025
Article in Interface focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid movement in the interstitial space of the brain affects the clearance of waste products, which is an important factor in the pathophysiology of dementia. Estimating interstitial fluid (ISF) flow is critical to understanding these processes; yet, it has proven difficult to measure non-invasively. The pulsatile component of ISF flow may be particularly important for clearance, e.g. by facilitating fluid mixing. Directly measuring ISF flows is challenging due to the slow velocities and small volume fractions involved; however, pulsatile flows present a unique opportunity as their driving forces can be estimated from observations of pulsatile tissue motion. In this work, we present pressure gradient magnetic resonance imaging (pgMRI), which assimilates retrospectively gated pulsatile tissue deformations measured with a displacement encoding with stimulated echoes MRI sequence into a patient-specific poroelastic computational model by estimating the distribution of fluid sources. The new method is demonstrated to recover a spherical fluid source accurately from synthetic data with simulated noise of up to 20%, and to produce not previously reported
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.