Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191031›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2025

Matthew McGarry, Damian Sowinski, Likun Tan, John Weaver, Jacobus J M Zwanenburg, Keith Paulsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Interface focus · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew McGarryThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Damian SowinskiThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Likun TanThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
John WeaverThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Jacobus J M ZwanenburgTranslational Neuroimaging Group, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Keith PaulsenThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluid movement in the interstitial space of the brain affects the clearance of waste products, which is an important factor in the pathophysiology of dementia. Estimating interstitial fluid (ISF) flow is critical to understanding these processes; yet, it has proven difficult to measure non-invasively. The pulsatile component of ISF flow may be particularly important for clearance, e.g. by facilitating fluid mixing. Directly measuring ISF flows is challenging due to the slow velocities and small volume fractions involved; however, pulsatile flows present a unique opportunity as their driving forces can be estimated from observations of pulsatile tissue motion. In this work, we present pressure gradient magnetic resonance imaging (pgMRI), which assimilates retrospectively gated pulsatile tissue deformations measured with a displacement encoding with stimulated echoes MRI sequence into a patient-specific poroelastic computational model by estimating the distribution of fluid sources. The new method is demonstrated to recover a spherical fluid source accurately from synthetic data with simulated noise of up to 20%, and to produce not previously reported

Indexed as

brain pulsatilityglymphatic systeminterstitial fluid flowporoelasticitypressure gradient imaging

Identifiers

PMID40191031
PMCPMC11969188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.