ArticleInterface focus2025
Estimation of fluid flow velocities in cortical brain tissue driven by the microvasculature.
Article in Interface focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MR-AIV reveals in vivo brain-wide fluid flow with physics-informed AI.Science advances · 2026Article
- Dynamics of brain valves: ostensible rectification mechanisms for cerebrospinal fluid flow.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Estimation of fluid flow velocities in cortical brain tissue driven by the microvasculature.Interface focus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a modelling framework for describing bulk fluid flow in brain tissue. Within this framework, using computational simulation, we estimate bulk flow velocities in the grey matter parenchyma due to static or slowly varying water potential gradients-hydrostatic pressure gradients and osmotic pressure gradients. Working with the situation that experimental evidence and some model parameter estimates, as we point out, are presently insufficient to estimate velocities precisely, we explore feasible parameter ranges resulting in a range of estimates. We consider the effect of realistic microvascular architecture (extracted from mouse cortical grey matter). Although the estimated velocities are small in magnitude (e.g. in comparison to blood flow velocities), the passive transport of solutes with the bulk fluid can be a relevant process when considering larger molecules transported over larger distances. We compare velocity magnitudes resulting from filtration and pulsations. Filtration can lead to continuous directed fluid flow in the parenchyma, while pulsation-driven flow is (at least partly) reversible. For the first time, we consider the effect of the vascular architecture on the velocity distribution in a tissue sample of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.