Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40191005›Full record

Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Preservative Free Cyclosporine in Dry Eye Disease.

Aafreen Bari, Aishwarya Dasgupta, Tushar Agarwal, Tanuj Dada, Namrata Sharma

Abstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aafreen BariDR. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Aishwarya DasguptaDR. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Tushar AgarwalDR. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Tanuj DadaDR. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Namrata SharmaDR. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2124-7542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is an ocular surface ailment with a high prevalence in the current era. One of the management principles involves the treatment of the underlying ocular surface inflammation. Topical Cyclosporine therapy is an effective treatment option. However, achieving an adequate drug concentration at the site of action and minimising the associated adverse drug effects, such as stinging and burning sensations at the site of instillation, are the biggest challenges. A preservative-free formulation of Cyclosporine 0.05% (Cyclisis-PF, Intas Pharmaceuticals, India) was studied in 50 patients with mild to moderate DED in a prospective interventional study. Eye drops were prescribed twice daily in addition to conventional treatment. At 12 weeks follow-up, the tear film stability was better in terms of improved tear break up time (TBUT) (p < 0.01), non-invasive break up time (NIBUT) (p < 0.001), Schirmer's test (p < 0.01), lipid layer thickness (LLT) (p = 0.006), tear meniscus height (TMH) (p < 0.01), corneal staining score (p < 0.01), and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score (p < 0.01) at the three-month follow-up. Only five of the 50 (10%) patients had mild adverse drug effects in the form of mild stinging. However, none of the patients discontinued this drug. In conclusion, preservative free cyclosporine is a safe, effective and well tolerated treatment modality in cases of mild to moderate DED.

Indexed as

Cyclisis-PFdry eye diseasepreservative free cyclosporine

Identifiers

PMID40191005
PMCPMC11970282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.