Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190990›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Patient-Reported Favorable Outcomes of a Minimum Five-Year Follow-Up After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Daniel I Razick, Muzammil Akhtar, Faith Sumandea, Tri Huynh, David Adams, Lara Ali, Adam A Razick, Jimmy Wen, Amir A Jamali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel I RazickSurgery, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, USA.
Muzammil AkhtarSurgery, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, USA.
Faith SumandeaFamily Medicine, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, USA.
Tri HuynhOrthopaedic Surgery, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, USA.
David AdamsOrthopaedic Surgery, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
Lara AliObstetrics and Gynaecology, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, USA.
Adam A RazickPsychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Jimmy WenPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, USA.
Amir A JamaliOrthopedic Surgery, Joint Preservation Institute, Sacramento, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a procedure performed to address patellofemoral instability. The primary objective of this paper is to evaluate studies reporting the outcomes of MPFL reconstruction at a minimum five-year follow-up through analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), re-dislocations, and range of motion. We hypothesize that MPFL reconstruction will demonstrate excellent PROs, low redislocation rates, and full range of motion. A search following guidelines established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was performed in three databases on March 23, 2024: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The query was performed utilizing the Boolean search phrase "(Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction OR MPFL reconstruction). There were no restrictions set to the search. Studies were included if they reported on outcomes of MPFL reconstruction at a minimum follow-up of five years. Twelve studies published between 2007 and 2023, containing 498 patients and 521 knees were included with a mean follow-up period of 98 months (60-215). Autologous gracilis grafts were the most common source used for MPFL reconstruction. Statistically significant improvements were found in preoperative to postoperative Kujala, Lysholm, and Tegner scores (p < 0.001). The overall re-dislocation rate across all studies was 5.75%, and the reoperation rate was 0.38%. MPFL reconstruction demonstrates excellent PROs with low redislocation rates at a minimum five-year follow-up and can be safely considered in patients with patellar instability.

Indexed as

medial patellofemoral reconstructionmpflmpfl reconstructionpatellapatellofemoral instability

Identifiers

PMID40190990
PMCPMC11972060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.