Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190961›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Enhancing Diagnostic Quality of Intra-Oral Radiographs Through Targeted Training Interventions and Super User Integration.

Saffa Dean, Ravi Rathod, Hitesh Bansal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saffa DeanOral Surgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Ravi RathodOral Surgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Hitesh BansalOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental and oral and maxillofacial surgery professions rely on intra-oral radiographs to effectively diagnose and carry out necessary treatment. A retrospective comparative analysis was carried out on a sample of digital radiographs from two sites within the same National Health Service (NHS) trust. Images were graded as per Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (FGDP) guidelines as either 'Acceptable' or 'Not Acceptable'. The FGDP state that 95% of digital radiographs taken within a department should be rated as "acceptable" in terms of diagnostic quality. Diagnostic quality was assessed based on the ability to identify structures necessary for treatment and whether the radiographs had to be retaken. Additionally, surveys were given out to both the medical and dental radiographers across both sites to gather data on their level of training in dental radiography, experience and confidence. The results revealed significant disparities in diagnostic quality of radiographs across both sites and training events and confidence levels between medical and dental radiographers. This paper outlines strategic improvements to the radiography team training, the establishment of a super user system to standardize training quality, and the introduction of a shared rota to enhance clinical efficiency. These initiatives were placed in order to improve radiograph quality and boost the confidence of medical radiographers in intra-oral imaging, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes and reducing their exposure to excessive radiation.

Indexed as

dental x-raydiagnosticintra-oral radiographysuper usertraining intervention

Identifiers

PMID40190961
PMCPMC11970211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.