Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190925›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Employing Squeeze-and-Excitation Architecture in a Fine-Tuned Convolutional Neural Network for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tumor Classification.

Kian A Huang, Ahmad Alkadri, Neelesh Prakash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kian A HuangRadiology, University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
Ahmad AlkadriRadiology, University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
Neelesh PrakashRadiology, University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2021, there were 182,520 cases of brain and central nervous system (CNS) cancers in the U.S. and 25,400 new cases of brain cancer in 2024. Early detection via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) significantly improves patient outcomes. This study fine-tunes a residual neural network 50 version 2 (ResNet50V2), a convolutional neural network (CNN), with squeeze-and-excitation (SE) attention mechanisms to enhance MRI-based tumor classification compared to a base ResNet50V2 model. By incorporating SE blocks, the model improves feature prioritization, effectively distinguishing glioma (n = 901), meningioma (n = 913), pituitary tumor (n = 844), and no tumor (n = 438). Trained on a publicly available Kaggle dataset (N = 3,096), the proposed model achieved a 98.4% classification accuracy and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.999, outperforming the base model's 92.6% accuracy and 0.987 AUC. Statistically significant improvements were observed in meningioma (p = 0.013) and pituitary tumor (p = 0.015) classification accuracy, highlighting the SE model's superior ability to differentiate tumor types. SE attention mechanisms enhance diagnostic precision by addressing feature extraction limitations and long-range dependencies in medical imaging. However, challenges such as dataset size constraints, overfitting risks, and potential representation bias remain. Future research will focus on expanding dataset diversity, exploring vision transformers (ViTs) for improved feature extraction, and employing generative adversarial networks (GANs) for data augmentation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence in radiologybrain tumorscomputer visiondeep learningmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40190925
PMCPMC11970440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.