Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190909›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Systematic Review.

Almontasir Belah Alsadig Abdalwahab Abdallah, Sally Ibrahim Hafez Sadaka, Elryah I Ali, Saadalnour Abusail Mustafa Bilal, Mohammad Omar Abdelrahman, Fatima Bashir Fakiali Mohammed, Samah Dafallah Nimir Ahmed, Nuha Elrayah Abdelrahim Saeed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Almontasir Belah Alsadig Abdalwahab AbdallahDepartment of Pediatrics, Maternity and Children Hospital, Najran, SAU.
Sally Ibrahim Hafez SadakaDepartment of Pediatrics, Armed Forced Hospital Najran, Najran, SAU.
Elryah I AliDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Northern Border University, Arar, SAU.
Saadalnour Abusail Mustafa BilalDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran, SAU.
Mohammad Omar AbdelrahmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternity and Children Hospital, Najran, SAU.
Fatima Bashir Fakiali MohammedDepartment of Pediatrics, Dawadmi General Hospital, Al Duwadimi, SAU.
Samah Dafallah Nimir AhmedDepartment of Pediatrics, Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southend-on-Sea, GBR.
Nuha Elrayah Abdelrahim SaeedDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, SDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) could transform due to artificial intelligence (AI), which could improve patient outcomes, increase diagnostic accuracy, and streamline repetitive procedures. The goal of this systematic review was to outline how AI can be used to enhance any health outcomes in pediatric intensive care. We searched four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore) for relevant studies using a predefined systematic search. We found 267 studies in these four databases. The studies were first screened to remove the duplicates and then screened by titles to remove irrelevant studies. The studies were further screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, in which 32 studies were found suitable for inclusion in this study. The studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Prediction Model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) tool. After AI was implemented, almost 22% (n = 7) of studies showed an immediate effect and enhanced health outcomes. A small number of studies involved AI implementation in actual PICUs, while the majority focused on experimental testing. AI models outperformed conventional clinical modalities among the remaining 78% (n = 25) and might have indirectly impacted patient outcomes. Significant variation in metrics and standardization was found when health outcomes were quantitatively assessed using statistical measures, including specificity (38%; n = 12) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) (56%; n = 18). There are not sufficient studies showing that AI has significantly enhanced pediatric critical care patients' health outcomes. To evaluate AI's impact, more prospective, experimental research is required, utilizing verified outcome measures, defined metrics, and established application frameworks.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencehealth outcomepediatric intensive care unitpediatricspicu

Identifiers

PMID40190909
PMCPMC11971983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.