Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190898›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Nanomaterial Applications in Restorative Dentistry: Reinforcement and Therapeutic Applications (Part II).

Sahar M Elmarsafy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sahar M ElmarsafyDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology has been widely introduced into many areas of dentistry, including restorative dentistry, where it has contributed greatly to the improvement of restorative materials and procedures. This review was conceived with the aim of exploring the various applications of nanotechnology in restorative dentistry. The review consists of two parts. The first part addressed applications for remineralization inhibition and remineralization. This current review is the second part aimed at focusing on the reinforcement of restorative materials and other therapeutic applications of nanomaterials. Among the nanoparticles that are used to reinforce restorative materials are carbon, zirconia, hydroxyapatite, titanium dioxide, alumina, and gold nanoparticles. Furthermore, other promising applications of nanotechnology are for hypersensitivity management, protective varnish, whitening effect, drug delivery, and nanorobotics, which includes performing major tooth repairs and conducting dentition renaturalization procedures. These applications highlight the potential of nanoparticles in restorative dentistry; however, there are still certain limitations that need to be handled.

Indexed as

composite resindental restorationsdrug deliverynanodentistrynanoparticlesnanoroboticsnanotechnologynanotissue engineeringreinforcementtooth regeneration

Identifiers

PMID40190898
PMCPMC11972103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.