ArticleCureus2025
Comparative Study of Cold Sensation, Pinprick, and Perfusion Index in Evaluating the Quality of Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: An Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Ultrasound (USG)-guided brachial plexus block has become the preferred method for surgeries of the upper limb as it reduces the risks of pneumothorax, nerve injury, and local anesthetic toxicity. An objective, noninvasive technique for evaluating the block's effectiveness is the perfusion index (PI). An increased PI suggests a successful brachial plexus block. Aims and objectives The study aimed to evaluate and compare cold sensation, pinprick, and PI to determine the most effective indicator for assessing the quality of USG-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (SCBPBs). Materials and methods The study included 92 patients. Each patient received 25 mL of local anesthetics (10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine, 10 mL of 2% lignocaine, and 5 mL of 0.9% normal saline) for USG-guided SCBPB. Responses to cold sensation, pinprick, and PI were noted for operative and control limbs starting right after block introduction till 20 minutes at intervals of 5 minutes. After 20 minutes, a modified Bromage scale was used to evaluate the motor block, and a 3-point scale was used to evaluate the block's quality. If the block quality was unsatisfactory or resulted in complete failure, such patients were considered for general anesthesia. Results Significantly higher PI in the blocked arm than the unblocked arm was observed across all periods. The PI and PI ratio cut-off values at 10 minutes were 3.25 and 2.75, respectively. At 10 minutes, the PI's sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were 100%. At 10 minutes, the sensitivity of the pinprick and cold sensation was 75% and 82%, respectively, and at 20 minutes, it reached 100%. All three methods' positive predictive value was 100% at 10 minutes. The NPV for cold sensation and pinprick gradually increased, reaching 100% at 20 minutes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis showed that the PI reached a value of 0.983 by 10 minutes. Conclusion PI values were significantly higher in the blocked arm than in the unblocked arm. A successful block can be predicted with 100% sensitivity and specificity at 10 minutes if the PI is more than 3.25 and the PI ratio is more than 2.75. The AUROC analysis confirms that PI values are reliable early indicators of block success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.