ArticleCureus2025
The Inflammatory Burden in Heart Failure: A Cohort Study on Potential Biomarkers in Heart Failure With Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heart Failure with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Network Interpretive Framework of Mechanisms, Phenotypes, and Therapeutic Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Prognostic significance of the TyG index combined with the NLR for heart failure: a retrospective study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive value of the combined evaluation of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase level for coronary artery lesions in patients with acute Kawasaki disease.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Monocyte-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of 3-month mortality in elderly heart failure patients: a retrospective Chinese cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Congestion and systemic inflammation in acute heart failure: correlations and prognostic role.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Heart failure (HF) is characterized by impaired cardiac function. Based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), it is classified into HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Each phenotype has distinct pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical features. Recent findings indicate that systemic inflammation is a significant factor in the progression of heart failure. Inflammatory biomarkers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), may serve as valuable tools for evaluating the inflammatory response in heart failure. Materials and methods This prospective observational study, which included 171 HF patients, was conducted from February 2022 to January 2023 at the Intensive Care Unit, University Clinical Centre Tuzla. Based on LVEF, patients were categorized into HFrEF, HFmrEF, and a control group (HFpEF). The study aimed to assess the prognostic value of NLR, MLR, and LMR in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality over a 12-month follow-up period. Results NLR and MLR were significantly higher, while LMR was lower in both HFrEF and HFmrEF compared to controls, indicating a strong inflammatory response, particularly in HFrEF. NLR demonstrated a strong ability to distinguish between HF phenotypes. HFmrEF's markedly higher high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTroponin I) level suggested higher cardiac stress. MACE rates were similar across groups; mortality was significantly higher in HFrEF. Conclusion Inflammatory biomarkers NLR, MLR, LMR, and hsTroponin I could be crucial in assessing heart failure, particularly in patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.