ArticleCureus2025
How Does a Cyclops Lesion Impact Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Recovery?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case explores the complexities of treating a flexion restriction in a patient following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, medial meniscus repair, and lateral meniscectomy. The aim is to provide insights into the treatment pathway when a flexion restriction develops post-ACL reconstruction and fails to improve with nonoperative measures. The patient, a 16-year-old high school track athlete, sustained a torn right ACL in a car accident and presented with severe knee instability, difficulty climbing stairs, and pain during ambulation. This case highlights the use of various nonoperative treatment strategies to address a flexion restriction that began developing within one month postoperatively. Despite aggressive physical therapy, the use of a knee extension machine, a brace locked in extension, and steroid treatment, the patient exhibited a persistent flexion restriction of five degrees, eventually necessitating surgical intervention. Ultimately, the patient achieved full recovery after undergoing arthroscopic lysis of adhesions and manipulation under anesthesia performed 10 months after the initial ACL reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.