Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190869›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Skin-Related Adverse Reactions in Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents-Induced Hypersensitivity: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Saraa A Al Jawad, Hussain A Abusreer, Ali A Ali, Alwaleed M Alamro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saraa A Al JawadRadiology/MRI, Omran General Hospital, Ahsa, SAU.
Hussain A AbusreerRadiology, Omran General Hospital, Alhasa, SAU.
Ali A AliMedicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, SDN.
Alwaleed M AlamroInternal Medicine, Qassim University, Al-Qassim, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have been used in clinical settings for several decades and in general they have established a good safety profile. Despite the use of chelating agents, some adverse reactions might occur when using these agents. This review aimed to assess the relationship between administered dose of Gadolinium-based contrast and the rate, duration, and severity of skin-related adverse reactions. Four electronic databases were searched using various relevant keywords. Duplicate records were removed, and the remaining records were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. The inclusion criteria were observational or experimental studies that analyzed the rate of immediate and/or delayed adverse reactions to GBCAs in magnetic resonance imaging. Data were extracted into a pre-designed spreadsheet. Ten studies were deemed eligible to be included in this review. A total of 691,007 GBCAs injections/patients were included in these studies. Six hundred seventy-nine skin-related adverse reactions were reported among the study participants, with a rate of 0.10%, urticaria was the most common (499 cases, 74.7%), while allergic dermatitis (three cases, 0.5%) and angioedema (four cases, 0.6%) were least frequent. In conclusion, the rate of these skin-related adverse reactions was low. The most commonly reported reactions were urticaria, rash, and pruritus. Most of these reported reactions were mild, no significant association was found in the volume of contrast agents and the risk for developing adverse reactions reported in the included studies.

Indexed as

contrast-induced reactionsgadolinium-based contrast agentshypersensitivity reactionsmagnetic resonance imaging (mri)skin-related adverse reactions

Identifiers

PMID40190869
PMCPMC11972015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.