ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Effect of premature luteinizing hormone surge on pregnancy outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection or
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of GnRH antagonist protocols versus progestin-primed ovarian stimulation on reproductive outcomes in advanced reproductive age women: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Effects of high basal luteinizing hormone levels on in vitro fertilization/intra-cytoplasmic injection outcomes in polycystic ovarian syndrome: a retrospective study.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A premature surge in luteinizing hormone (LH) during ovarian stimulation cycles between 12 and 25% has been commonly reported. However, there is still a lack of consensus on whether premature LH surge affects pregnancy outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of premature LH surge on pregnancy rates in women with and without premature LH surge during intracytoplasmic sperm injection or stimulation of Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. Information related to 771 women who had IVF/ICSI cycles between January 2022 and December 2022 was reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on premature LH surge. Results: There was no significant difference in patients' characteristics. The live birth rates were significantly higher in women without premature LH surge than in women with LH surge (12.9% vs. 5.6%) ( Conclusion: The study demonstrates significantly higher live birth rates in women without premature LH surge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.