Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40190816›Full record

ArticleIS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging2025

Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Digital Pathology: Assess Zero-shot Segmentation on Whole Slide Imaging.

Ruining Deng, Can Cui, Quan Liu, Tianyuan Yao, Lucas W Remedios, Shunxing Bao, Bennett A Landman, Lee E Wheless, Lori A Coburn, Keith T Wilson and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Explainable opportunistic osteoporosis screening from chest X-rays: a retrospective comparison of foundation models.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Generative AI and foundation models in medical image.Radiological physics and technology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. TriSAM: Tri-Plane SAM for Zero-Shot Cortical Blood Vessel Segmentation in VEM Images.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ruining DengDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Can CuiDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Quan LiuDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Tianyuan YaoDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Lucas W RemediosDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Shunxing BaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Bennett A LandmanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Lee E WhelessDepartment of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Lori A CoburnDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Keith T WilsonDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Yaohong WangDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Shilin ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Agnes B FogoDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Haichun YangDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Yucheng TangNVIDIA Corporation, Redmond, WA.
Yuankai HuoDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Translational Analysis CoreP30DK058404 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RICHARD M. PEEK · 2002 to 2026
$29.9M
RESOLUTION OF GLOMERULOSCLEROSISR01DK056942 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI FOGO, AGNES B. · 2001 to 2021
$4.9M
Integrated Training in Engineering and DiabetesT32DK101003 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jamey D. Young · 2014 to 2026
$3.9M
Spermidine as a New Therapy for Colitis and Chemopreventive for Colitis-associated CarcinogenesisR01DK128200 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WILSON, KEITH T. · 2021 to 2024
$2.7M
AI-empowered 3D Computer Vision and Image-Omics Integration for Digital Kidney HistopathologyR01DK135597 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Yuankai Huo · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
BLRD VA I01 BX004366CSRD VA I01 CX002171CSRD VA I01 CX002473CSRD VA I01 CX002662NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK058404NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056942NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128200NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK135597NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK101003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The segment anything model (SAM) was released as a foundation model for image segmentation. The promptable segmentation model was trained by over 1 billion masks on 11M licensed and privacy-respecting images. The model supports zero-shot image segmentation with various segmentation prompts (e.g., points, boxes, masks). It makes the SAM attractive for medical image analysis, especially for digital pathology where the training data are rare. In this study, we evaluate the zero-shot segmentation performance of SAM model on representative segmentation tasks on whole slide imaging (WSI), including (1) tumor segmentation, (2) non-tumor tissue segmentation, (3) cell nuclei segmentation. Core Results: The results suggest that the zero-shot SAM model achieves remarkable segmentation performance for large connected objects. However, it does not consistently achieve satisfying performance for dense instance object segmentation, even with 20 prompts (clicks/boxes) on each image. We also summarized the identified limitations for digital pathology: (1) image resolution, (2) multiple scales, (3) prompt selection, and (4) model fine-tuning. In the future, the few-shot fine-tuning with images from downstream pathological segmentation tasks might help the model to achieve better performance in dense object segmentation.

Identifiers

PMID40190816
PMCPMC11971729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.