ArticleSAGE open nursing
Translating, Adapting and Validating the Revised MISSCARE Survey for Use in Norwegian Hospitals-A Pilot Study.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation and psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the revised MISSCARE Survey.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the Romanian Version of the Revised MISSCARE Survey: A Single-Centre Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The original Methods: A forward translation, followed by an expert panel's back-translation, cognitive interviews, and final version testing were conducted. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted to investigate the underlying factor structure. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed for a test-retest evaluation. IBM SPSS Statistics (version 29) was used for all analyses. Results: A total of 120 nurses and nursing assistants took part in the study assessing the psychometric properties of the Norwegian adaptation of the revised Conclusions: The revised
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.