ArticleSAGE open nursing
Peer-Assisted Learning in Undergraduate Midwifery Clinical Education: A Qualitative Study on Experiences of Nursing Students From Three Namibian Training Institutions.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Peer-assisted learning is widely used in nursing education and is reported to have a positive impact on the students' learning process. However, students' experiences of peer-assisted learning from midwifery clinical education in resource-constrained, overcrowded, and small maternity sections are not documented. Objective: This study was undertaken to explore undergraduate nursing students' experiences of peer-assisted learning in midwifery clinical education context in Namibia. Methods: The study was approached from a social constructivism, with explorative, descriptive, and contextual qualitative as a methodological approach. The sample consisted of 32 nursing students from three training institutions, who were conveniently sampled. Data collection was via five focus group discussions, which used a focus group discussion guide, audio recorder, and field notes as research instruments. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Main themes that emerged from thematic analysis are students' conceptions of peer-assisted learning, benefits, challenges, and suggestions made to improve peer-assisted learning in midwifery clinical education. In thematic area of students' conceptions of peer-assisted learning, peer teaching tools, engagement, care, and support of peers were recorded as subthemes. The benefits of peer-assisted learning included teamwork, professional identity, a deep approach to learning, communication, coping mechanisms, and socialization. Challenges experienced by students while using peer-assisted learning are learning wrong practices from peers, personality influence, discrimination, labeling, and name calling. Suggestions made by students were formalization and training of students on peer-assisted learning. Conclusions: Students' experiences of peer-assisted learning relate to how they understand it as a concept, their interaction with peers, and learning materials. In addition, students made suggestions to improve peer-assisted learning in midwifery clinical practice. These results may be useful in developing peer-assisted frameworks and guiding documents for use in its implementation in midwifery clinical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.