ArticlePain reports2025
First-episode vs recurrent nonspecific neck pain: clinical characteristics, recovery, and the impact of pain severity on well-being and functionality.
Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study (1) compared clinical characteristics between patients with first-episode and recurrent nonspecific neck pain (NSNP), and (2) examined differences in daily activities and psychological well-being between patients with minimal pain (1-2 numeric pain rating scale) and moderate to severe pain (≥3 numeric pain rating scale) at 6 weeks postpresentation. Methods: The study was conducted across 30 primary physiotherapy practices and included patients experiencing a new NSNP episode lasting ≤12 weeks. For the first research objective, baseline data collection encompasses neck pain symptoms, prior conditions, and work-related, general, psychological, and behavioral factors. In addition, pain intensity was measured at 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. For the second objective, pain intensity, psychological factors, and disability were assessed. Results: No clinically meaningful differences were observed in clinical characteristics or recovery rates between patients with first-episode and recurrent NSNP. However, meaningful differences were found in disability, patient concerns, and self-efficacy between minimal and moderate to severe pain groups at 6 weeks. Patients with higher pain intensity had higher disability scores (1.33-point [SD 0.84-1.81]) difference on a 0 to 7 scale, lower self-efficacy (-1.25-point [SD -1.84 to -0.65]) difference on a 0 to 12 scale, and greater concerns (1.87-point [SD 1.21-2.52] difference on a 0 to 10 scale). Conclusion: No clinically meaningful differences in clinical characteristics or pain recovery rates exist between first-episode and recurrent NSNP. However, significant and clinically meaningful differences exist in the impact of pain severity on daily activities, patient concerns, and self-efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.